检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯燕珊 余友谊 梁瑾 李杰生 FENG Yanshan;YU Youyi;LIANG Jin;LI Jiesheng(China Energy Engineering Group Guangxi Electric Power Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Nanning 530007,China)
机构地区:[1]中国能源建设集团广西电力设计研究院有限公司,广西南宁530007
出 处:《红水河》2025年第2期54-59,共6页
摘 要:笔者聚焦于光伏支架系统中的连续檩条,运用数值模拟Midas软件深入分析其在不同柱距布置条件下的力学性能,旨在优化柱距方案以提升结构经济性与安全性。以广西某农光互补项目为背景,选取2×14阵列的固定支架,通过改变柱距布置,分析檩条在风压组合与风吸组合下的内力分布。研究表明:在风压组合控制下,大边跨方案为最优方案,而在风吸组合控制下,小边跨方案更优;设置拉条系统时,大边跨方案为最优方案,而不设置拉条系统时,小边跨方案更佳。该研究成果对光伏支架结构设计具有重要指导意义,可为相关工程实践提供参考。This study focuses on the continuous purlins in photovoltaic(PV)support systems,employing numerical simulation Midas software to deeply analyze their mechanical performance under different column spacing arrangements.The aim is to optimize column spacing schemes to enhance structural economy and safety.Taking an agricultural-photovoltaic complementary project in Guangxi as a case study,a 2×14 array fixed support structure is selected.By varying column spacing arrangements,the internal force distribution of purlins under wind pressure combinations and wind suction combinations is analyzed.The results indicate that under wind pressure combination control,the large side-span scheme is optimal,whereas under wind suction combination control,the small side-span scheme performs better;When a bracing system is implemented,the large side-span scheme is optimal,while the small side-span scheme is preferable without a bracing system.These findings provide significant guidance for the structural design of PV support systems and serve as a reference for related engineering practices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7