等级评审员视角下医院医疗技术临床应用评价指标体系构建研究  

Research on the Construction of Evaluation Index System of Clinical Application of Hospital Medical Technology from the Perspective of Grade Reviewer

作　　者：魏巍[1] 谭琳琳[1] 时松和[2] 李姣姣 裴斐斐 Wei Wei;Tan Linlin;Shi Songhe(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University/The Second Clinical Medical School of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan,450003,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学第二附属医院·郑州大学第二临床医学院,河南郑州450003 [2]郑州大学公共卫生学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《中国医院管理》2025年第5期54-58,共5页Chinese Hospital Management

基　　金：河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(LHGJ20210375,RKX202402022)。

摘　　要：目的从医院等级评审员的角度出发,建立医院医疗技术临床应用评价指标体系,旨在为医疗技术的规范化管理和持续改进提供参考依据。方法综合运用文献分析法、德尔菲专家咨询法等方法建立评价指标体系,利用层次分析法对各评价指标权重进行确定,并应用该评价指标体系对3家医院医疗技术临床应用相关数据进行评价,采用TOPSIS法分析评价效果。结果医疗技术临床应用评价指标体系包括3个一级指标、6个二级指标、31个三级指标。一级指标包括支持与保障、组织与实施、质控与管理,其权重分别为0.163、0.297、0.540,一致性指标=0.005。TOPSIS法结果显示:医疗技术临床应用效果排序为医院C>医院A>医院B。结论构建的医疗技术临床应用评价指标体系具有较高的科学性,专家的积极性、权威性和一致性程度较高。可为医疗技术规范化管理和持续改进提供科学依据,同时也为医院等级评审员在评审过程中提供明确的评估标准。Objective From the perspective of hospital grade reviewers,the evaluation index system for the clinical application of hospital medical technology is established to provide reference basis for the standardized management and continuous improvement of medical technology.Methods Based on the comprehensive application of literature analysis,Delphi expert consultation and so on,evaluation index system was established,and the weight of each index is determined by the hierarchical analysis method.Data relevant to the clinical application of medical technologies of 3 hospitals were analyzed,and the evaluation effect was evaluated using the index system by TOPSIS.Results The evaluation index system for clinical application of medical technology includes 3 first-level indicators,6 second-level indicators and 31 third-level indicators.First-level indexes include support and guarantee,organization and implementation,and quality control and management,their weights are 0.163,0.297 and 0.540,and CI=0.005.TOPSIS results showed that the effect of the 3 hospitals from high to low was hospital C,hospital A and hospital B.Conclusion The evaluation index system constructed in it is highly scientific,and the enthusiasm,authority and consistency of the experts are relatively high.This evaluation index system provides the scientific basis for standardized management and continuous improvement of medical technology,and also provides a clear evaluation criteria and basis for the hospital grade reviewers in the evaluation process.

关 键 词：等级评审员 医疗技术 临床应用 评价指标体系 

分 类 号：R197.323.2[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]