检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张锦强 杨湘 苏学德[1] 王欢欢 李铭[1] 李鹏程[1] ZHANG Jinqiang;YANG Xiang;SU Xuede;WANG Huanhuan;LI Ming;LI Pengcheng(Institute of Horticulture,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science/Construction Crop Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm innovation and quality improvement and efficiency increment,Shehezi Xinjiang 832000,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆农垦科学院林园研究所/库尔勒香梨种质创新与提质增效兵团重点实验室,新疆石河子832000
出 处:《新疆农业科学》2025年第2期446-453,共8页Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences
基 金:新疆生产建设兵团重大科技计划项目(2022AA001);新疆生产建设兵团科技创新人才计划-科技创新骨干人才项目(2022CB003-02)。
摘 要:【目的】研究日光温室甜樱桃不同栽培模式下果实品质差异性,为新疆北疆日光温室甜樱桃栽培科学管理提供理论依据。【方法】以新疆北疆日光温室主栽品种美早甜樱桃作为研究对象,比较测定直立和一边倒2种栽培模式下甜樱桃果实成熟期24项品质指标,采用变异、相关性及主成分分析筛选核心指标,利用AHP层次分析建立综合品质评价模型。【结果】不同栽培模式甜樱桃果实各项指标存在差异,其中甜度值、可食率、总酸、a^(*)和葡萄糖为甜樱桃果实品质评价的核心指标;建立了甜樱桃果实品质评价模型Y(综合得分)=0.121×可食率的标准化值+0.075×a^(*)的标准化值+0.199×甜度值的标准化值+0.068×总酸含量的标准化值+0.037×葡萄糖含量的标准化值。【结论】直立栽培模式下甜樱桃果实综合品质优于一边倒栽培模式。【Objective】To clarify the differences in fruit quality of sweet cherries under different cultivation modes in sunlight greenhouses and provide theoretical basis for research and scientific management of sweet cherry cultivation in sunlight greenhouses in northern Xinjiang.【Methods】This study focused on the main variety of sweet cherry Meizao grown in a sunlight greenhouse in northern Xinjiang.Comparing upright and one-sided modes of 24 quality indicators during fruit ripening were measured,and core indicators were selected through variance analysis,correlation analysis,and principal component analysis.A comprehensive quality evaluation model was established using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP).【Results】The results showed that there were differences in various indicators of sweet cherry fruit under different cultivation modes,among which sweetness value,edible rate,total acid,a^(*),and glucose were the core indicators for evaluating the quality of sweet cherry fruit;A sweet cherry fruit quality evaluation model Y(comprehensive score)=0.121 was established using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)×Standardized value of edible rate+0.075×The standardized value of a^(*)+0.199×Normalized sweetness value+0.068×Normalized value of total acid content+0.037×Standardized value of glucose content.【Conclusion】The evaluation results show that the comprehensive fruit quality of the upright cultivation mode is relatively better than that of the one sided cultivation mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222