检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡少东[1] HU Shao-dong(School of Business Shantou University,Shantou,Guangdong 515063)
出 处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2024年第11期5-14,94,共11页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(22BJL008);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD21LN22)。
摘 要:1927—1935年是南京国民政府加大民信局管制,乃至拟取缔民信局,实现邮政国家专营的关键时期,面对法律政策变化带来的威胁,批局采取行动以维护自身合法性。研究表明,批局面临社区、市场和国家多元制度逻辑,且社区、市场逻辑与国家逻辑间存在较大冲突。为反抗国家取缔批局,侨批业者采取了集体行动,中华总商会成为场域中具有重要影响力的行动者,场域的碎片化和适度集中导致了制度复杂性,为应对制度复杂性,侨批业者采取了反抗和游说策略,最终影响了国民政府改变取缔批局政策,批局得以保留并成为国家邮政体系的一部分。The period from 1927 to 1935 was a crucial period when the Nanjing National Government strengthened the control of the Pi-Ju and even planned to ban it,in order to achieve the monopoly of the postal service by the state.Faced with the threat of changes in legal policies,the Pi-Ju took action to maintain its legitimacy.Research shows that the Pi-Ju faced multiple institutional logics of community,market,and state,and there were significant conflicts between the logic of the community and market and that of the state.In order to resist the state’s ban on the Pi-Ju,the Pi-Ju took collective action.The Chinese Chamber of Commerce in Singapore became an influential actor in the field.The fragmentation and moderate centralization of the field led to institutional complexity.In order to deal with institutional complexity,under the leadership of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce,the Pi-Ju adopted resistance and lobbying strategies,which ultimately influenced the National Government to change its policy of banning the Pi-Ju.The Pi-Ju was retained and became part of the national postal system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177