对汉晋都邑赋的“据实性批评”及其历史影响  

Criticism Based on Truth Verification of Capital[WT4HX]Fu in Han and Jin Dynasties and Its Historical Influence

作　　者：蔡琪 CAI Qi(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学中文系,北京100871

出　　处：《辽东学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期8-15,共8页Journal of Liaodong University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：汉晋都邑赋显露“方志性”特质。司马迁对《天子游猎赋》作出“侈靡过其实”的评价,成为对汉晋都邑赋“据实性批评”之滥觞。待到西晋,左思《三都赋序》不仅点明前人赋作“侈言无验,虽丽非经”不足之处,还将“据实性批评”进行内化,以“稽之地图”“验之方志”为指导原则。世人依傍“志本于史”的观念审察汉晋都邑赋主要集中在两点:一是写入非本地物产,二是出现奇灵瑰怪之物。左思《三都赋序》既深刻影响后代都邑赋书写,又在广泛接受中奠定了经典地位,成为都邑赋史上的赋序范式。Capital Fu in Han and Jin Dynasties has the characteristics of“local chronicles”.Sima Qian’s“extravagant”evaluation of Tianzi Youlie Fu(天子游猎赋)became the origin of the criticism based on truth verification of capital Fu in Han and Jin Dynasties.Until the Western Jin Dynasty,Zuo Si’s Preface to Sandu Fu(三都赋序)not only pointed out the shortcomings of the predecessors’Fu,which were“empty words without verification,and although beautiful,they were not classics”,but also internalized the criticism based on verification,and made“to check the content with maps and local chronicles”as the guiding principle.Based on the concept that local chronicles rooted in history,the criticism based on truth verification of capital Fu in Han and Jin Dynasties is mainly focused on two points:one is to write non-local products,and the other is to write strange things.Zuo Si’s Preface to Sandu Fu(三都赋序)not only deeply influenced the writing of capital Fu in later generations,but also laid its classic position by widespread acceptance,becoming the paradigm of Fu preface in the history of capital Fu.

关 键 词：汉晋都邑赋 “方志性” “据实性批评” 《三都赋序》 

分 类 号：I207.2[文学—中国文学]