检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡海迪 HU Hai-di(Research and Development Center for Literary and Artistic Creation,Liaoning University of Arts,Shenyang 110032,China;Editorial Department of Yalu River,Shenyang 110032,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁文学院文艺创作研究发展中心,辽宁沈阳110032 [2]《鸭绿江》编辑部,辽宁沈阳110032
出 处:《辽东学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期107-114,共8页Journal of Liaodong University:Social Science Edition
基 金:辽宁省公共文化服务中心重点科研项目“20世纪初中国出土文献出版与文化遗产保护观念之关系研究”(2024zxyjkt-003)。
摘 要:1909年,罗振玉、王仁俊、蒋斧等出版首批的敦煌文献是中国敦煌学研究的开端。从这一出版活动中,可透视出敦煌文献最初流散的文化原因。晚清士人囿于传统的图书分类方式及其衍生的文化观念,在藏经洞发现后数年间,误认敦煌文献全部为佛教遗书而未予充分重视,致使外国文化侵略者乘虚而入。探寻其原因有助厘清这一历史公案中某些有争议人物的功过是非,也可为今人保护、传承古代文明遗存提供有益启示。In 1909,Luo Zhenyu,Wang Renjun,Jiang Fu and others published the first batch of Dunhuang documents,which is the beginning of the study of Dunhuang in China.From this publishing activity,we can see the cultural reasons for the initial loss of Dunhuang literature.Constrained by the traditional classification of books and their derived cultural concepts,scholars in the late Qing Dynasty mistakenly believed that all Dunhuang documents were Buddhist relics and did not pay enough attention to them in the years after the discovery of the Dunhuang library cave,which led to the invasion of foreign cultural invaders.Exploring the reasons is helpful to clarify the merits and demerits of some controversial figures in this historical case,and can also provide useful enlightenment for the protection and inheritance of ancient civilization relics.
分 类 号:K870.6[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] G237.9[历史地理—历史学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147