检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430079 [2]苏州大学马克思主义学院,江苏苏州215006
出 处:《深圳社会科学》2025年第3期30-39,共10页Social Sciences in Shenzhen
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“奥地利社会主义理论与实践研究”(20BKS167)。
摘 要:守正创新是贯穿于马克思主义发展史之中的鲜明特质之一,马克思主义发展史,就是一部马克思主义在“守正”与“创新”的辩证统一中不断演进、丰富自身内涵并拓展理论边界的斗争史。第二国际时期,作为马克思主义发展历程中的一个至关重要的节点,兼具“中介性”与“过渡性”的显著双重特征,成为了连接“原生态马克思主义”与“马克思之后的马克思主义”之间的过渡桥梁和纽带。在这一关键时期,马克思主义面临着如何既继承传统理论精髓,又创新发展以适应时代变革的重大现实问题与理论挑战。纵观第二国际时期,马克思主义思想内部出现了明显的分化趋势。一方面,出现了对马克思主义的歪曲和庸俗化理解,这些理论观点偏离了马克思主义的本质精神和核心原则;另一方面,也有一批理论家对于马克思主义进行了深入的创造性阐释与创新性阐发,为马克思主义的发展注入了新的生机与活力,这些都是值得严肃对待和深入研究的论题。在评价第二国际理论家时,应充分考虑他们所处的历史背景和时代条件,从守正创新的具体视域出发,对其不同的理论路径分化进行科学、客观的分析与判断。进而在理论、经验与实践的相互交映中,提炼出对于当代马克思主义发展具有借鉴意义的宝贵参考和现实启示。The integrity and innovation is one of the distinctive qualities running through the development history of Marxism.The history of the development of Marxism is a history of Marxism’s effort to constantly evolve,enrich its own connotation and expand its theoretical boundaries in the dialectical unity of“correctness”and“innovation”.The Second International period,as a crucial milestone in the course of Marxism’s development,combines the remarkable dual characteristics of“intermediary”and“transitional”,becoming a transitional bridge between“original Marxism”and“post-Marxist Marxism”.In this critical period,Marxism was facing the major practical problem and theoretical challenge of how to inherit the essence of traditional theory and how to innovate and develop it to adapt to the changes of the times.Throughout the period of the Second International,there was a clear tendency of differentiation within Marxist thought.On the one hand,there were distorted and vulgarized understandings of Marxism,which deviated from its essential spirit and core principles.On the other hand,a group of theorists carried out in-depth creative interpretation and innovative elaboration of Marxism,injecting new vitality and vigor into the development of Marxism,which are topics worthy of serious treatment and in-depth study.When evaluating the theorists of the Second International,the historical background and conditions of the times in which they lived should be fully taken into account,and their different theoretical paths of differentiation should be analyzed and judged scientifically and objectively from the specific perspective of keeping the right and innovating.Then,in the mutual reflection of theory,experience and practice,valuable references and practical revelations that are of significance for the development of contemporary Marxism should be derived.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49