聚众斗殴罪第2款法律拟制说之证成  

The Proof of the Legislative Fiction of Article Two of the Crime of Mob Fighting

作　　者：杨衬 YANG Chen(School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《岭南师范学院学报》2025年第1期55-62,共8页Journal of Lingnan Normal University

摘　　要：聚众斗殴罪第2款法规属性目前存在法律拟制说、注意规定说、转化犯说和法律推定说之争且适用混乱。对比不同观点在犯罪构成、罪数、量刑以及刑事证明上的异同,明确争议焦点为仅有认识可能性是否符合责任主义原则以及将过失拟制为故意是否有违罪刑均衡原则。从责任主义视角下对主客观相一致原则进行解释得出认识可能性作为责任主义边界的合理所在并辅之以具体判断标准;从罪刑均衡视角下通过对法益和罪数的合理评价论证拟制的必要性。There are theory disputes over the attributes of Article Two of the crime of mob fighting,including theories of legislative fiction,attention requirement,transformed crime and legal presumption.By comparing the similarities and differences in the criminal composition,number of offenses,sentencing and criminal proof of different opinions,it is found that the focus of the controversies is whether the possibility of cognition in the theory of legislative fiction is consistent with the principle of accountability and whether it is contrary to the principle of balance of punishment and crime to formulate negligence as intentionality.After the principle of subjective-objective consistency is interpreted from the perspective of accountability,it is concluded that the possibility of cognition is reasonable as the boundary of accountability and specific judgment criteria are put forward.And the necessity of legalization is demonstrated from the perspective of the balance of crimes and punishments through the circumscribed evaluation of legal interests and the number of offense.

关 键 词：聚众斗殴致人重伤、死亡 法律拟制 责任主义 罪刑均衡 

分 类 号：D924.36[政治法律—刑法学]