国有企业国际规则的历史演进、逻辑焦点及中国因应  

Historical Evolution,Legal Focus and China’s Response of SOEs Rule

作　　者：孙南翔[1] SUN Nanxiang

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院国际法研究所

出　　处：《武大国际法评论》2025年第1期88-102,共15页Wuhan University International Law Review

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“涉外法治体系建设中的管辖权演化规则研究”(23BFX145)的成果。

摘　　要：近期美国等西方国家致力于将国有企业规则纳入区域经贸安排之中,其核心在于试图通过“身份规制”限定国有企业的发展空间。回溯历史,国际贸易协定对企业的规范焦点在于维护公正合理的市场经济秩序。通过对CPTPP国有企业商业性规则的条约解释,国有企业的“商业考虑”义务不必然表明企业与政府之间不存在关联,而逻辑重点在于确保此类关联性不对其他企业造成不利的影响。以公平竞争为核心的国有企业国际规则与我国推动国有企业高质量发展的精神不相违背。鉴于此,一方面应以条约解释的方法促使CPTPP缔约方对国有企业的公平竞争义务作出正确的认识,另一方面应通过立法等方式确保国有企业在产业链中的独立地位。Recently,the United States and other Western countries have been committed to in-corporating SOEs rules into regional economic and trade arrangements.The core of this is an at-tempt to limit the development space of SOEs through identity regulation.Looking back at history,the normative focus of international trade agreements on enterprises requires to maintain a fair and equitable market economic order.Through the treaty interpretation of the CPTPP SOEs commercial rules,the commercial consideration obligation of state-owned enterprises does not necessarily indi-cate that there is no connection between the enterprise and the government,and the logical focus is to ensure that such correlations will not put negative impact on other enterprises.As the core of in-ternational rules for SOEs,the fair competition is not violated with the notion in the China’s promo-tion of high-quality development of SOEs.In this regard,the treaty interpretation should be taken to promote the parties of CPTPP to have a correct understanding of SOEs’obligation of fair competi-tion.In addition,the independent status of state-owned enterprises in the industrial chain should be ensured through legislation and other means.

关 键 词：CPTPP 国有企业国际规则 区域贸易协定 竞争规则 商业考虑 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]