检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏昱昊 于涛[1,2,3] WEI Yuhao;YU Tao
机构地区:[1]南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 [2]南京大学城市与区域规划系 [3]中国城市规划学会城乡治理与政策研究专业委员会
出 处:《城市规划》2025年第4期26-32,45,共8页City Planning Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51878330)。
摘 要:由于尺度的不对称,大都市区低层级政府推动跨界治理的过程受到制约。以深圳南山区和香港地区为例,发现非对称尺度的跨界治理存在两个过程,其一是政府间的纵向尺度重构以促进跨界资本和人才流动;其二是政府、企业、社会团体间的横向多中心治理以服务跨界人才“安居”和“乐业”所需。且伴随各个过程分别存在特殊政策产业园区、基层社区服务中心、专业化服务平台和生活性服务场所作为空间载体。最后提出应当遵循以尺度重构发挥各层级政府优势、以多中心治理稳固跨界合作根基、以平台载体建设服务跨界要素等具体路径,从而推动大都市区非对称尺度的跨界治理。The promotion of cross-border governance by lower-level governments in metropolitan areas is often restricted due to the asymmetry of scales.Through the case study of Nanshan District of Shenzhen and Hong Kong,this paper proposes that there are two processes of cross-border governance at asymmetric scales.One is the vertical rescaling between governments to promote the flow of capital and talent across borders;the other is the horizontal polycentric governance between the governments,enterprises,and social organizations to meet the needs of cross-border talents for living and work.Along with each process,there are special policy-supported industrial parks,grass-roots community service centers,specialized service platforms,and life service venues as spatial carriers.In the end,the paper presents specific paths to promoting the cross-border governance at asymmetric scales in metropolitan areas,such as giving full play to the advantages of governments at various levels through rescaling,consolidating cross-border cooperation through polycentric governance,and providing services for cross-border elements through platform construction.
关 键 词:大都市区 跨界治理 非对称尺度 尺度重构 多中心治理
分 类 号:TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13