检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周炳炎[1] 曹江[1] 秦永文[1] 胡建强[1]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学第一附属医院心内科,上海市200433
出 处:《心血管康复医学杂志》2002年第6期510-512,共3页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨心内测定老年人窦房结恢复时间(SNRT)、校正的窦房结恢复时间(CSNRT)和窦房传导时间(SACT)的正常值。方法:对53例无病态窦房结综合征的老年人进行经皮右心房电生理检查,测定其SNRT和SACT。结果:53例老年人SACT98.7±34.4ms(51~222ms);SNRT1058.5±275.7ms(602~2260ms);CSNRT266.1±177.6ms(79~1189ms)。发现SNRT>1500ms,CSNRT>600ms各1例,SACT>150ms者有3例。结论:老年人心内测定的SNRT、CSNRT与文献中食道调搏法测定的无显著差异,而SACT则明显低于食道调搏法(P<0.01),与刺激部位有关。Objective: To explore the normal value of sinus node recovery time (SNRT), corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) and sinoatrial condection time (SACT) in aged person. Methods : Detected the sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial condection time by intra-cardiac assay in 53 cases of aged person without sick sinus syndrome. Results: SNRT was 1058. 5±275. 7 (602-2260) ms, CSNRT was 266.1±177. 6 (79-1189) ms, SACT was 98. 7±34. 4 (51 - 222)ms in 53 aged person. Conclusion: There were no significant difference among SNRT, CSNRT detected by this technique and esophagus frequency modulation in literature, but SACT detected by this technique decreased significantly compared that detected by esophagus frequency modulation.
分 类 号:R541.76[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15