浅析航海过失和管货过失  

On the Negligence in the Navigation of the Ship and the Negligence in the Management of the Cargo

作　　者：徐仲建 

机构地区：[1]上海对外贸易学院,上海200336

出　　处：《浙江万里学院学报》2002年第4期90-93,共4页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

摘　　要：《海牙规则》确立了海运承运人对航海过失造成的货损免责,航海过失可分为驾船过失和管船过失。但承运人对管货过失造成的货损应承担赔偿责任。区分航海过失,尤其是管船过失与管货过失,成为一项极其重要的任务。近百年来,有关于此的争议不断涌现,国际上要求废除航海过失免责的呼声日益高涨。《汉堡规则》虽废除了航海过失免责,但亦未被国际社会所接受。文章探讨了航海过失与管货过失的区分标准,并尝试建立一种新的承运人责任制度。It was established by < Hague Rule > that the ocean carrier is not responsible for the loss or damage arising from the negligence in the navigation or management of ship, but responsible for the loss or damage arising from the negeligence in the management of the cargo. It became very important but difficult to distinguish between the management of the ship and the management of the cargo. Hundreds of cases about it have been handled in the last century. Canceling the carrier's privilege has been contionally demanded by the international community. < Hamburg Rule > abolished the carrier's liability system of the < Hague Rule> ,but it has not been accepted by the world community. This paper analyses the standards of distinction between the the negligence in the management of the ship and the negligence in the management of the cargo, and recommends a new carrer's liablity system.

关 键 词：管货过失 航海过失 驾船过失 管船过失 承运人责任 《海牙规范》 《汉堡规则》 

分 类 号：D996.19[政治法律—经济法学]