论中国传统司法责任制度及其当代价值  

On The Traditional Chinese Judicial Responsibility System and Its Contemporary Value

作　　者：柴荣[1] 林群丰[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《河北学刊》2015年第6期159-165,共7页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究项目<中国土地法律历史变迁研究>(12YJA820003);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持项目<中国农民土地权益保障法律机制研究>(NCET-12-063)

摘　　要：传统中国司法责任制度内容十分丰富,对当代中国司法责任制度的完善具有重要借鉴意义。从法律构造上看,传统司法责任制度在案件受理、事实查明与法律援引等方面都建立起了较为完备的规范体系。从功能上看,传统司法责任制度通过将道德义务法律化这一方式,稳固和扩张了儒家规范体系,有效地维护了社会共识。同时,司法责任制度为高效的司法服务提供了保障,也在大多数司法审判中维护了社会正义。当今中国正在加紧完善司法责任制度建设,这就要求吸收传统司法责任制度中的优良因子,包括内容明确的司法责任体系和案件受理制度。同时,有效防范其所面临的问题,如避免设置过高的司法责任标准等。The content of the traditional Chinese judicial responsibility system is very rich,which is of great value to the perfection of China's judicial responsibility system. From the perspective of the legal structure,the traditional Chinese had built up relatively complete system of norms in the case acceptance,confirmation of facts and application of law. In the view of the function,through the way of making the moral obligations institutionalization,traditional judicial responsibility system make the Chinese social consensus——Confucian norms of the system——steady and expansion,Which safeguarding social consensus effectively. At the same time,the judicial responsibility system provide the security for efficient judicial services,maintaining social justice in the vast majority of cases,which has made important contributions for accumulating legitimacy. Nowadays,China is straggling to improve the judicial responsibility system,which requires the absorption of traditional legal experiences,including the clearly content of judicial responsibility system and the case acceptance system; while prevent the problems which had happened in the past,such as avoiding set a too high judicial liability standard.

关 键 词：司法责任 社会共识 合法性 

分 类 号：D926.1[政治法律—法学]