检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州市第十二人民医院外一科,广州510620
出 处:《解剖学研究》2002年第4期289-290,304,共3页Anatomy Research
摘 要:目的 比较无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术解剖学特点及临床意义。方法 采用美国巴德公司生产的PerFix充填物加补片无张力疝修补术治疗25例腹股沟疝,并与26例传统术式比较分析,总结这些临床资料,评定疗效。结果无张力疝修补术不需做腹股沟区广泛解剖,且效果好,25例无1例复发,而传统疝修补术26例中有4例复发,统计学分析有显著性差异。结论无张力疝修补术较传统术式复发率低、操作相对简单、并发症少,值得在临床上加以推广。Objective To compare the differences of anatomy characteristics and clinical significance between tension-free hernioplasty and traditional hernioplasty. Method Tweaty-five cases of inguinal hernia were treated with Perfix plug which were produced by Bard company of American, and 26 cases of inguinal hernia were treated with traditional hernioplasty. The clinic effects of the two methods were evaluated. Results Tension-free hernioplasty need not extensively anatomize hernia area and had good effect. Among the 25 patients accepted tension-free hemioplasty no person reoccured, and among the 26 patients accepted traditional hernioplasty 4 persons reoccured. And there was statistically significant between them. Conclusion Tension-free hernioplasty is better than traditional hemioplasty, and the patients recovered fast and had low reoccur rate. It deservers to adopt tension-free hemioplasty extensively.
关 键 词:无张力疝修补术 腹股沟疝 PerFix充填物加补片 临床解剖
分 类 号:R322[医药卫生—人体解剖和组织胚胎学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16