检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐善水[1] 孙克华[2] 李真保[1] 江晓春[1] 戴易[1] 林元浩[1] 李振球[1]
机构地区:[1]皖南医学院弋矶山医院神经外科,安徽芜湖241001 [2]南京军区总医院神经外科,江苏南京210000
出 处:《蚌埠医学院学报》2003年第1期28-30,共3页Journal of Bengbu Medical College
摘 要:目的 :探讨组合切口额颞大骨瓣开颅术在救治广泛额颞部脑损伤中的应用。方法 :对 75例经CT扫描诊断的单侧额颞部广泛脑损伤有手术指征的患者随机采用额颞马蹄形切口普通骨瓣开颅 (常规术式 )和组合切口额颞大骨瓣开颅 (组合术式 )。以格拉斯哥预后评分判定疗效 ,结果进行统计学处理。结果 :组合术式组恢复良好率优于常规术式组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;术中脑膨出发生率较常规术式组有所下降 ,但差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;术后昏迷时间明显缩短 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :组合术式额颞大骨瓣开颅切口设计符合美容要求 ,减压充分、合理 ,能有效改善脑循环 。Objective:To evaluate the effect of combination incisions on frontal temporal large craniotomy for treatment of extensive severe temporofrontal head injury. Methods:Seventy five cases of CT diagnosed unilateral severe temporofrontal head injury were randomd to common frontal temporal craniotomy(routine method,in 35 cases) or large craniotomy with combination incisions(combination method,in 40 cases). The effects were evaluated by Glasgow outcome scale and the results were statistically analyzed.Results:The recovery rate in the group with combination method was higher than that with routine method( P <0.05) and the occurrence of intraoperative encephalocele was decreased in the group with combination method but the difference was not significant( P >0.05).The time of posto perative coma was shorter in the group with combination method than that with routine method( P <0.05).Conclusions:The design of combination incisions coincides with the plastic surgery techniques.The decompression of the large craniotomy is complete and reasonable.As the circulation of brain is improved,the prognosis of patients with extensive temporofrontal severe head injury is much better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117