2种治疗冠心病心绞痛用药方案的成本-效果分析  

COST-EFFECT ANALYSIS OF TWO MEDICATION PLANS IN TREATING ANGINA PECTORIS OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE

作　　者：胡仁欣[1] 崔玉芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]临沂医专附属临沂市人民医院,山东临沂276003

出　　处：《临沂医学专科学校学报》2003年第1期35-37,共3页Journal of Linyi Medical College

摘　　要：目的　 探讨 2种药物治疗方案治疗冠心病心绞痛的成本 效果。方法　 选择单纯心绞痛病人 32例 ,随机分为 2组。A组给予鲁南欣康 2 0mg ,2次 d ,口服 ;B组给予消心痛 10mg ,1次 8h ,口服。运用药物经济学成本 效果分析方法 ,对 2组治疗方案进行回顾性分析、评价。结果　 平均住院时间 :A组 (9± 3)d ,B组 (15± 6 )d。心绞痛总有效率 :A组 88.9% ,B组 5 7.1% ;心电图总有效率 :A组 6 6 .7% ,B组 5 0 %。总成本 :A组为 4 0 3.2 0元 ,B组为 6 37.5 0元。结论　 药物经济学在优化治疗方案、指导合理用药。Objective To analyze the costs and effects of two medication plans in treating angina pectoris of coronary heart disease.Methods 32 cases of simple angina pectoris were randomly divided into Group A treated with oral administration of 20mg lunanxinkang,a traditional Chinese medicine,twice a day,and Group B treated with oral administration of 10mg xiaoxintong,another traditional Chinese medicine,once 8 hours.The results were retrospectively reviewed by cost effect analysis in drug economics.Results The average hospitalization durations were 9±3 days in Group A and 15±6 days in Group B.The total effective rates were 88.9% in Group A and 57.1% in Group B.The total effective detection rates were 66.7% in Group A and 50% in Group B.The total costs were RMB 403.20 in Group A and RMB 637.50 in Group B.Conclusion Drug economics plays an important role in bettering treatment plans,instructing reasonable medication and promoting economic efficacy.

关 键 词：冠心病 心绞痛 用药方案 成本-效果分析 药物经济学 

分 类 号：R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病] F407.7[医药卫生—内科学]