检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所重点实验室,湖北武汉430071 [2]中国科学院武汉物理与数学研究所,湖北武汉430071
出 处:《岩土力学》2003年第1期127-129,共3页Rock and Soil Mechanics
摘 要:分别使用小变形和大变形弹塑性有限元方法,对位于不同埋深的地下洞室围岩动态进行了计算,分析了围岩中的塑性区、位移场和应力场。当洞室埋深较小时,岩体双重非线性表现不明显,小变形与大变形方法所得结果相当接近;当洞室埋深较大时,岩体的双重非线性明显呈现而使得两种方法的结果相差较大,此时宜选择用大变形理论。The finite-element method with small deformation formulation as well as the large deformation formulation, is used to perform elastoplastic analyses of an underground opening with different embedded depths, and investigate the plastic zones, displacement distributions and secondary stress fields in the surrounding rockmass. It can be seen that when the embedded depth is small the computations obtained from small deformation and large deformation methods are quite close to each other, but when the embedded depth is larger , there exists a distinct difference between the results of the two methods because the double-nonlinearity of surrounding rockmass acts obviously at this time , so for the latter case, the right selection is applying the large deformation theory.
关 键 词:地下洞室 埋深 围岩 有限元分析 位移场 应力场 变形理论
分 类 号:TU94[建筑科学—建筑技术科学] TU457
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15