新解释学:马克思哲学思想史的方法论辨识——评阿尔都塞的思想史论模式  

Neo-hermeneutics:The Methodological Recognition of the Thought History of Marxist Philosophy——A Critique on Althusser's Theory Model of Thought History

作　　者：张一兵[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学校长办,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《求是学刊》2003年第2期19-26,共8页Seeking Truth

摘　　要：在西方马克思主义哲学中 ,阿尔都塞是以科学方法论标识自己的哲学特征的。当他的这种准结构主义解释模型进入马克思主义哲学史研究领域时 ,的确给前苏东式思想史论以猛烈的冲击。其中令人耳目一新的观点 ,就是他对思想史目的论和起源论的批判。此外 ,阿尔都塞还对传统马克思哲学史研究中著名的“颠倒说”In western Marxist philosophy Althusser marks his own philosophical characteristic with scientific methodology. When his hermeneutical model of quasi-structuralism enters the research field of Marxist philosophy history, it really gives a violent strike on former Soviet-Eastern European theory of thought history. The most brand-new idea is his critique on teleology and genesis theory of thought history. Althusser also has undergone a reverse reflection on the famous 'Perversion Idea' in the traditional research of Marxist philosophy history.

关 键 词：西方马克思主义 阿尔都塞 马克思主义哲学史 《1844年经济学--哲学手稿》 解释学 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]