检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学结构工程灾变与控制教育部重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨150090 [2]广西大学土木建筑工程学院,广西南宁530023
出 处:《建筑结构学报》2015年第S2期126-130,共5页Journal of Building Structures
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51408155);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2014M551251)
摘 要:作为评估结构抗连续倒塌能力的一种有效方法,Pushdown分析方法已得到广泛应用。基于Pushdown方法采用的满跨加载、受损跨加载以及局部加载三种竖向加载模式,研究不同竖向加载模式对二维和三维钢筋混凝土框架结构模型Pushdown分析结果的影响。通过对二维和三维钢筋混凝土梁-柱子结构在中柱失效后的拟静力加载试验进行模拟,验证有限元模型的正确性。以一栋8层4跨钢筋混凝土框架结构作为研究对象,对比不同竖向加载模式下的Pushdown曲线。对比结果表明:在满跨加载和受损跨加载模式下,结构的Pushdown曲线基本一致。在局部加载模式下,结构移除柱上方节点的变形更大。As an effective method for the evaluation of the performance of structures in resisting the progressive collapse,the Pushdown analysis method has been widely employed for the progressive collapse studies. There were three vertical load patterns used in Pushdown analysis,namely,the full-bay loading pattern,the damage-bay loading pattern,and the local loading pattern. The effects of adopting different vertical load patterns on the Pushdown analysis were evaluated by using 2D and 3D reinforced concrete( RC) frame modelling. The finite element model was validated by simulating the quasi-static tests of the 2D and 3D RC beam-column subassemblies subjected to the loss of midcolumn scenario. A RC frame structure was selected as the case study structure and the Pushdown curves in accordance with different vertical loading patterns were compared. Results show that the full-bay loading pattern may achieve similar Pushdown curves to the damage-bay loading pattern. However,the local loading pattern always generates larger deformation at the joint beyond the missing column than the other two.
关 键 词:钢筋混凝土框架结构 竖向加载模式 移除柱 Pushdown分析 连续倒塌
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.168.26