算法合谋反垄断初探——OECD《算法与合谋》报告介评(上)  

Antitrust Regulation of Algorithmic Collusion——Analysis of OECD Report on Algorithms and Collusion(Part 1)

作　　者：韩伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学

出　　处：《竞争政策研究》2017年第5期112-121,共10页Competition Policy Research

基　　金：2013年国家社科基金青年项目"合并救济中限制性条件的匹配性研究"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：随着数字经济的发展,算法对商业社会的影响不断深化,算法合谋问题近年也逐渐成为全球主要反垄断辖区关注的问题,少量案例也已出现。本文以2017年经济合作与发展组织发布的《算法与合谋》报告为基础,对算法概念及商业应用、算法促进竞争的效果、算法合谋风险、算法给竞争执法带来的挑战以及针对算法的市场管制等问题进行了梳理与介绍。算法合谋反垄断问题的研究全球还处于起步阶段,很多问题都待深入研究。我们还需要进一步厘清算法反垄断问题与数据、人工智能等相关问题的关系。就我国而言,针对算法合谋这类技术革新带来的新问题,应遵循竞争优先、慎用管制的原则,重视算法型消费者等市场解决机制,把握技术发展的现状,适时启动市场调研。With the development of digital economy, the influence of algorithm on business community is also deepening. In recent years, the algorithmic collusion problem has gradually become the concerns of the world's major antitrust jurisdictions, there have been some cases. Based on the "Algorithms and Collusion" report released by OECD in 2017, this paper discusses the concepts of algorithms and their business applications, the effectiveness of algorithms in promoting competition, the collusion risk of algorithms and the challenges that algorithms bring to competition enforcement, algorithm control and other issues. Our research on algorithmic collusion has just begun, and many problems need further study. We also need to learn more about the relationship between algorithmic collusion and big data, artificial intelligence, and other related issues. For China, the principle of competition rules first and prudential direct control should be followed, the market mechanism of algorithmic consumer should be emphasized, the status quo of technology development should be understood, and market research should be carried out timely.

关 键 词：算法 合谋 人工智能 反垄断 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]