“事实物权”理论之批判  

Criticism on“Factual Real Right” Theory

作　　者：赵湘乐[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《科学．经济．社会》2015年第3期111-116,共6页Science Economy Society

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目:14XNH014

摘　　要："事实物权"理论认为,未登记的夫妻共有人因婚姻财产制度事实上获得了物权。但是,夫妻因婚姻关系成为财产共有人并非意味着其成为共同权利人。非权利人一方之所以享有相应的权利,本质在于其享有的平等处理权分割了界定财产的权利。其中,平等处理权对于物权的适用范围最广,从而造成了"共同物权人"的表象;但对于股权和知识产权的适用范围一般仅限于转让和质押方面。在司法实践中,为保障交易安全,权利人一方擅自转让或质押夫妻共有财产,第三人符合善意取得标准的,另一方不得主张转让或质押行为无效;非权利人一方擅自转让或质押夫妻共有财产,只有当构成表见代理时,方可认定转让或质押行为有效。'Factual Real Right'theory believes that the joint tenant of property based on the marriage property system haspractically acquired the real right. However,the joint tenant of property based on the marriage property system is not equalto the right holder. The non-right holder's right to exert the property is actually based on the equal treatment right,whichseparates the property right. Due to its wildest application in real right,it seems that the joint tenant of property based onthe marriage property system is equal to the real right holder,which is not the fact in light of equity or intellectual propertythat only applied in transfer or pledge. In order to protect the security of transactions,the unauthorized transfer or pledge ofjoint property should be effective when the assignor is right holder and the transferee can invoke bona fide acquisition,orthe assignor is non-right holder but there constitutes apparent agency.

关 键 词：婚姻财产制度 平等处理权 “事实物权”理论 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]