检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周惠中
机构地区:[1]西密执安大学
出 处:《经济学(季刊)》2002年第1期131-148,共18页China Economic Quarterly
摘 要:电信企业在不同的纵向结构和接入规制制度下表现出不同的行为和效率。在强制接入但接入费率不受规制的情况下,市话长话兼营结构下的长话资费比分离结构下的资费高。但在接入全面规制或完全市场化的情况下,兼营结构的效率较分离结构为高。在三种规制制度下,生产者的利润在分离结构下都比较高,而消费者却在兼营结构下得利较多。这些结论表明接入的规制应该跟产业政策和竞争政策结合起来考虑。本文还发现如果互联费率高于边际成本,那么网络经营者越多,市话资费可能会越高。Competition in telecommunications is affected by the vertical structure of the industry as well as regulation on access.We find that,under partial deregulation, where access is mandated but access rates are not regulated,the access charge and hence the price of long distance calls is lower when access providers are not integrated with long-distance operators than when they are integrated.However,under both complete deregulation and full regulation,competition in integration is more efficient than sepa- ration.Under all three regulation regimes,consumers are better off in integration than separation,while the firms are worse off.These results suggest that regulation on ac- cess should be formulated in conjunction with industrial or competition policy.We also find that two-part tariffs intensify competition among networks and that more access providers may actually reduce efficiency if the interconnection rate is set should be above the marginal cost.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222