保证责任期间若干问题新探  

New Discussing Some Difficult Problems On Warranty Period

作　　者：冯俊海 孙瑞玺 

机构地区：[1]山东省东营市河口区人民法院,山东河口257200 [2]山东达洋律师事务所,山东东营257094

出　　处：《河北法学》2003年第2期103-106,共4页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：保证责任期间 ① 构成债权人请求保证人承担保证责任权利消灭的法律事实。在学界是有争议的一项制度。保证责任期间的类型主要有约定和法定二种类型 ,催告期间不是保证责任期间。保证责任期间属于特殊的除斥期间 ,其特殊性在于当事人可以约定保证责任期间。保证责任期间适用诉讼时效期间中断、中止的规定 ,在理论上不合理 ,在实践中不具有可操作性 ,立法及司法解释应当进行修改。对保证责任期间的认定 ,要注意最高额保证合同保证责任期间的认定。Warranty period constitutes a legal fact the passing of which will entitle the warrantor to be exempted from the liability of warranty under the agreement (which will lead to a loss of the right of the debtor to request the warrantor to bear the liability of warranty according to the agreement). This is a rule (system) that has caused dispute in the field of legal science. Warranty period mainly falls into two categories: statutory period and agreed period. This paper holds that the period of demanding does not make warranty period and that warranty period belongs to a special right deprivation period, special for the reason that parties to a contract may agree upon the length of the period for warranty. The theoretical illogicality is also pointed out in the paper in regard to the stipulation that warranty period applies to the provisions on the discontinuance and suspension of limitation of action. This rule, unreasonable in theory and not easy to manage in practice, should be amended and modified in judicial interpretations and by legislative work. Besides, attention should also be paid to the identifying of the warranty period in the contract of warranty for the maximum amount.

关 键 词：合同 保证责任权利 保证责任期间 催告期间 约定期间 法定期间 诉讼时效期 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]