包膜控/缓释肥养分释放特性评价方法的研究  被引量:47

Progress in evaluation method study on nutrient release characteristics of coated controlledrelease fertilizer

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:杜建军[1] 廖宗文[2] 毛小云[2] 刘可星[2] 冯新[2] 

机构地区:[1]仲恺农业技术学院农学系,广东广州510225 [2]华南农业大学新肥料资源研究室,广东广州510642

出  处:《磷肥与复肥》2003年第2期11-13,40,共4页Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer

基  金:国家高技术研究发展计划项目 ( 863计划 ;2 0 0 1AA2 460 2 3 ) ;广东省科技计划百项工程项目 ( 2 KB0 5 60 1N) ;广东省重点科技攻关项目 ( A2 0 40 5 )

摘  要:分别以水、土壤、砂子、土壤 +砂子和土壤 +沸石为介质 ,研究了 5种控 /缓释肥的溶 (淋 )出特征。结果表明 ,同一肥料在不同介质中的溶 (淋 )出率和溶 (淋 )出模式有很大不同 ,这主要是由不同介质的性质决定的。水中溶出率虽可以快速比较不同控 /缓释肥的溶出速率 ,但用以估测肥料在田间的实际肥效 ,则产生较大的误差。这是因为土体内强烈的物理、化学、物理化学和生物学过程必然影响到肥料中养分的释放和释放出养分在土体内的各种转化过程 ,在种植作物的情况下 ,还受植物根系吸收养分的影响。因此 ,在评价控 /缓释肥时 ,考虑土壤因子 ,把“肥—土”作为一个整体来研究 ,才能使控 /缓释肥评价更客观。Several media of water, soil, sand, mixture of soil and sand, and mixture of soil and zeolite were used to study the nutrient release characteristics of five types of controlledrelease fertilizers(CRFs)/slowrelease fertilizers(SRFs). The results show that there are significant differences of release pattern between water dissolution and soil leaching rate due to the different properties of the media. Considerable errors might occur when the water dissolution rate method was used to estimate the field's fertilizer effect, though the method can make quick comparisons of nutrient release rates among different CRFs/SRFs. These processes, including the strong physical, chemical, physicochemical and biological ones, as well as the process of nutrient uptake of roots under crop planting condition, had important influences on whole nutrient release course. Therefore, soil factors should be emphasized. 'Fertilizer-soil' should be considered as an entirety for making evaluation of CRFs/SRFs more objective and reasonable .

关 键 词:包膜控/缓释肥 养分 释放特性 评价方法 研究 土壤因子 

分 类 号:S143[农业科学—肥料学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象