科学界对“ppm”的几种糊涂认识  

Some wrong opinions about "ppm" in scientific community

作　　者：孙二虎[1] 何洪英[1] 刘东渝[1] 

机构地区：[1]应用与环境生物学报编辑部,成都610041

出　　处：《编辑学报》2003年第1期26-28,共3页Acta Editologica

摘　　要：对包括编辑学界在内的科学界中至今仍有人把ppm作为单位来使用的原因进行了归纳和分析。认为4种糊涂认识是导致ppm继续存在于科学文献中的主要原因:一是对ppm的语言学缺陷问题无认识;二是对量纲一的量的性质认识有误;三是不了解习惯上将B的质量浓度单位“mg·L-1”写作ppm的特定条件;四是对国际科学界取缔ppm的要求不了解,误以为“不用ppm”的规定是中国的“土政策”。The reasons of using 'ppm' as a unit in the scientific community are summarized and analyzed in this paper. There are four wrong opinions about 'ppm' , i.e., knowing little about the linguistics shortcomings of ' ppm ', misunderstanding the characteristics of quantities of dimension one, being unfamiliar with the special conditions of regarding the mass concentration unit, 'mg·L-1', of B as 'ppm' and thinking the provisions of disusing 'ppm' were issued only by China.

关 键 词：“ppm” 科学文献 质量浓度单位 计量单位 

分 类 号：TB91[一般工业技术—计量学]