检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]泰兴市人民医院,江苏225400 [2]南京中医药大学第二临床医学院,江苏210029
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2003年第3期18-21,共4页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的 比较不同针灸方法对化疗呕吐患者胃动力的影响 ,为临床上采用不同的针灸疗法治疗化疗呕吐提供实验依据。方法 选取足三里穴 ,分别使用温针灸、针刺和艾灸 3种不同的治疗方法 ,以胃电频谱、波形、频率和波幅为临床观察指标 ,观察针灸对化疗呕吐患者胃动力的影响。结果 针刺的即时效应优于温针灸和艾灸 ,而温针灸的持续效应优于针刺和艾灸。结论 不同的针灸方法 ,其即时效应和持续效应不尽相同 ,在临床上可根据不同的病人采用不同的针灸疗法。Objective To compare the effects of different acupuncture methods on gastrodynamics in patients with postchemotherapeutic vomiting, different acupuncture methods were employed to treat postchemotherapeutic vomiting. Methods Zusanli (ST 36) was treated by warm needling, needling and moxibustion methods respectively; the spectrum, wave, frequency and amplitude of gastroelectricity were recorded. Results Different methods had different immediate effects and lasting effects. Specifically, the immediate effects of needling were better than those of warm needling and moxibustion.Conclusion Early administration of acupuncture is quite effective in improving the gastrodynamic. The lasting effects of warm needling were better than those of needling and moxibustion.
分 类 号:R246.5[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3