几种方法对手清洁消毒的监测  

Several Methods for Sterilizing Hands: A Surveillance

作　　者：杨翠芳[1] 张顺玲[1] 罗少儒[1] 陈万山[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州市第八人民医院,广东广州510060

出　　处：《中华医院感染学杂志》2003年第3期245-246,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology

摘　　要：目的　为医务人员在医疗护理中寻找高效快速、简单方便、无刺激的手消毒方法。方法　对传染病区医务人员 10 0人随机分 5组进行监测 (实验组 :健之素牌手消毒剂、洁芙柔消毒　喱、0 .2 %过氧乙酸液毛巾擦洗手、酸化电位水液毛巾擦手 ;对照组 :肥皂流动水洗手 )。结果　按上顺序排列其除菌率为 97.38%、79.19%、10 0 %、74 .6 %、6 8.2 6 % ,健之素和过氧乙酸组相仿 ,与其他几组比 ,差异有统计意义。结论　 0 .2 %过氧乙酸和健之素对手的消毒效果好 ,但健之素使用较方便简单易掌握。OBJECTIVE To find the method for sterilizing hands which is effective, fast, easy, conveniente and without stimulation for medical worker in nursing care. METHODS A total of 100 medical workers were tested. In test group Essentials of Health Skin and Hand Disinfectant, Jiefurou′s sterilizer gel, towels of 0.2% peracetic acid and electrolyzed oxidizing water were used. In control group only soap with flowing water was used for hand wash. RESULTS Their bacterial clearance was 97.38%, 79.19%, 100%, 74.6%, 68.26%, respectively. The efficacy of Essentials of Health Skin and Hand Disinfectant was similar to 0.2% peracetic acid. Both two were singnificant different compared with others. CONCLUSIONS 0.2% Peracetic acid and Essentials of Health Skin and Hand Disinfectant are preferred for sterilizing hands. But Essentials of Health Skin and Hand Disinfectant is more easier in use.

关 键 词：医护人员 手清洁消毒 监测 

分 类 号：R187.2[医药卫生—流行病学]