检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄波[1] 陈冬妹[2] 高添喜[1] 伍爱平[1] 刘勇[2] 雷飞跃 张雪平 何民 雷继敏[2]
机构地区:[1]广东中山市博爱医院神经外科,中山528400 [2]广东省中山市博爱医院内科 [3]湖南郴州市医院神经外科
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2003年第4期53-55,65,共4页China Journal of Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的 :探讨微创颅内血肿清除术在高血压脑出血治疗中的优越性。方法 :保守组 38例行内科综合治疗 ,开颅组 38例在保守组治疗的基础上开骨瓣或骨窗 ,清除血肿 ,微创组 36例在保守组治疗的基础上行CT片定位法微创颅内血肿清除术 ,比较三组治疗的有效率、死亡率和治疗前、后神经功能缺损评分 ,采用t和 χ2 检验比较。结果 :保守组有效率 4 2 .1% ,死亡率 2 1.1% ,开颅组有效率为 5 5 .3% ,死亡率为 10 .5 % ,微创组有效率为 91.7% ,死亡率 2 .8% ,微创组与开颅组和保守组比较均有显著性差异 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;微创组于治疗后第 1天神经功能缺损评分即见明显减少 ,而开颅组和保守组均于治疗后第 14天才有明显减少 ,微创组与开颅组和保守组比较均有显著性差异 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :微创颅内血肿清除术在高血压脑出血治疗中能提高有效率、降低死亡率、加快神经功能恢复。Objective:To evaluate the advantages of minimally invasive evacuation of hematoma for treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods:Thirty-eight cases in group A received conservative medical treatment, 38 cases in group B received craniotomy based on medical treatment and 36 cases in group C received minimally invasive evacuation based on medical treatment. The effective rate,mortality and neurological deficit scale of three groups were compared, and statistical data were processed with chi-square test.Results:The effective rate and mortality in group C were 91.7% and 2.8%, respectively, which was significantly different from that in group A(42.1% and 21.1%,respectively, P <0.05) and group B(55.3% and 10.5%,respectively, P <0.05). Conclusion:The minimally invasive evacuation of hematoma can improve the effective rate, decrease the mortality and promote the recovery of neurological function in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198