言语测听在助听器选配中的应用  被引量:6

The application of speech testing in choosing hearing aids

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:高建林[1] 杨月珍[2] 梁晨[1] 王晓阳[1] 吴竹梅[1] 杨丽[1] 

机构地区:[1]解放军第四一四医院听力中心 [2]解放军南京军医学院卫勤教研室,江苏省南京市210099

出  处:《中国临床康复》2003年第7期1122-1123,共2页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation

摘  要:目的言语测听在助听器的选配中有决定性的作用,中国临床应用较少,通过言语测听了解耳内式助听器和耳背式助听器的使用者在言语分辨率的差别。方法采用开放法和闭合法,分别对耳内式、耳背式助听器使用者,进行单耳聆听条件下的言语测试。言语信号类型选用单音节词和双音节词,每耳测听单音节词和双音节词各为20个。结果耳内式、耳背式助听器使用者的使用效果相比,在言语分辨率上无论开放式、闭合式对双音节词、单音节词的分辨率无显著性差异(P>0.05);双音节词和单音节词的分辨率比较,开放式的状态下,有显著性差异(P<0.05);闭合式的状态下,无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论在助听器的选配中言语测听的实际实施受诸多因素的影响。Aim Speech testing has been less applied in China.This paper studies the difference of spee ch resolving power between patients with in-the-ear(ITE)hearing aids and with behind-the-ea r(BTE)hearing aids through speech testing.Methods To test ITE and BTE hearing aids users,adopting open method and close method,through speech testing in the con-dition of only using one ear.Monosyllabic and disyllabic words were chosen as the type of speech and 20words were given to one ear.Results Compare the effect of using these kinds of ITE and BTE hearing aids,ITE and BTE had no significant difference in resolving power of both monosyllabic an d disyllabic words no matter through o pen method or close method.It was proved that P>0.5.When hearing aid users were dis tinguishing both monosyllabic and disyllabic words,in the condition of open method,mono-syllabic and disyllabic words had significant difference,namely P<0.05,while in the condition of close method,these two kinds of words had no significant difference,namely P>0.05.Conclusion Speech testing is necessary in choosing hearing aids,but the way is practically affected b y many factors.

关 键 词:言语测听 助听器 选配 内式 耳背式 言语分辩率  

分 类 号:R764.5[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象