效用价值论,还是劳动价值论?——评经济思想史上关于价值源泉的争论  

Utility Value Theory or Labor Value Theory:A Study on the Debates of Value Source from the History of Economic Thought

作　　者：孙宗伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《马克思主义理论学科研究》2016年第3期28-38,共11页Studies on Marxist Theory

摘　　要：效用抑或劳动孰为价值源泉的争论在经济思想史上由来已久。发生在边际效用价值学说与马克思劳动价值论之间的争论表明:把效用归结为价值源泉的学说,由于很难找到一个有效的衡量效用的尺度而受到人们的普遍质疑。认为价值是抽象劳动的凝结,用社会必要劳动时间来衡量价值的量的尺度的劳动价值学说,无论从历史还是逻辑角度看,都是经得起考验的。The debate on the value source of utility or labor has a long history in the economic thought. The marginal utility value theory which regards the subjective evaluation as the value has been widely questioned by most of people mainly because it is so difficulty to find a way to measure the utility where as labor value theory which attributes value to the abstract labor of humankind and that the value is measured by the the social necessary labor time can be testified from the history and logical view.

关 键 词：马克思 价值悖论 边际效用价值理论 劳动价值理论 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学] F014.31