检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱绍侯[1]
机构地区:[1]河南大学,河南开封475001
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2003年第2期51-56,共6页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:军功爵制本是春秋战国及秦汉时期的重要军政制度 ,但由于史书记载分散、简略 ,后人已很难知道军功爵制的真实价值。根据《二年律令》的珍贵资料 ,从经济价值、政治价值、以爵赎人、赎罪等方面来看 ,军功爵制在西汉初年仍具有真实的价值。例如 ,西汉初年各级军功爵受田宅的具体数量、爵制与官级的对比关系 ,一级爵可以免死罪一人等是前所未见的资料。因军功受田宅制实际上就是名田制 ,汉政府就是通过名田制培埴了一大批大、中、小军功地主和大量的自耕农。故说汉初是军功地主的天下 。Peerage by military merits was a system of army and government in Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods, its real value became obscure in later generations. Judging by the Two-Year Law, this system was valuable in the early Han Dynasty in economy, politics, ransoms, etc. For example there was a correlation between rank of peerage and rank of officials, and the first rank of peerage could spare one life from death penalty. The rank of peerage was also related with the size of land a peer could possess. It is reasonable to say that landlords of military merits dominated the early Han Dynasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.248.121