检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李为兵[1] 鄢俊安[1] 宋波[1] 李龙坤[1] 熊恩庆[1] 金锡御[1]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学附属西南医院全军泌尿专科中心,重庆400038
出 处:《第三军医大学学报》2003年第9期802-805,共4页Journal of Third Military Medical University
摘 要:目的 分析比较 3种膀胱颈悬吊手术在治疗真性压力性尿失禁中的作用。方法 回顾分析我院 3 6例行膀胱颈悬吊的压力性尿失禁患者 ,比较分析M M K手术、Stamey手术及耻骨锚定吊带术的治疗效果。结果 3种术式都能明显改善压力性尿失禁 ,在主观症状及尿动力学检查上均有显著进步 ,其中耻骨锚定吊带术具有较大优势。结论 膀胱颈悬吊术是治疗压力性尿失禁的有效方法 。Objective To analyze the effect of three methods of bladder neck suspension on the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Methods A total of 36 patients with stress incontinence undergoing bladder neck suspension were retrospectively analyzed. Comparative analysis was also conducted of the therapeutic efficacy of M M K operation, the Stamey operation and the Vesicar sling. Results Obvious improvement of the symptoms(objective symptoms and symptoms by urodynamic test) of stress incontinence resulted from all the three methods, among which the Vesicar sling was the best. Conclusion Bladder neck suspension, especially the Vesicar sling, is an effective method for the treatment of stress incontinence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4