检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]肇庆市第一人民医院,广东肇庆526021 [2]中山市卫生学校,广东中山528400 [3]广州市肿瘤医院,广东广州510000
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2003年第05b期15-16,共2页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的分析腥部肿块的CT诊断准确性,并与病理诊断作比较,探讨CT误诊的原因。方法将360例腹部肿块患者CT诊断后行手术,经病理诊断将其分为恶性肿瘤、良性肿瘤、炎症三大类,对CT与病理诊断进行比较分析。结果腹部肿块的CT诊断总体符合率为90.83%,误诊率为9.17%。结论CT与病理有很强的互补性,应重视病史并作出综合分析,以提高CT诊断的准确性。Objective To analyze the veracity of CT diagnosis for abdominal masses and compare withpathological diagnosis, and discuss the cause of CT misdiagnosis. Methods 360 cases of abdominal massesdiagnosed by CT were treated with operation. They were classified as malignant rumor, benign tumor andinflammation with CT diagmosis. Compared CT diagnosis and pathological diagnosis. Results The corre-spondence rate of CT diagnosis for abdominal masses is 90.83%, misdiagnosis rate is 9.17%, Conclusion The diagnosis complementary between CT and pathology is strong. Think much of disease history andanalyze comprehensively in order to improve the veracity of CT diagnosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171