检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学桥梁研究所,辽宁大连116024
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报》2003年第5期625-627,共3页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
摘 要:为研究混凝土自锚式悬索桥的结构受力特征以及与地锚式悬索桥的差别 .通过计算实例 ,分析比较混凝土自锚式悬索桥结构的力学特性 ,研究其拱度、矢跨比变化时引起的内力变化规律 ,混凝土收缩、徐变对内力影响的规律 .对于中小跨度的自锚式悬索桥来讲 ,除了主梁的轴力偏大以外 ,结构的其余内力与地锚式悬索桥的差别不是很大 ,差值在 10 %以内 .拱度和混凝土的收缩、徐变的影响比较明显 .与相应的水平加劲梁和不考虑收缩、徐变影响的计算结果比较 ,差值均在 2 0 %以上 .The mechanic performance of concrete self-anchored suspension bridge is studied and compared with that of the earth-anchored suspension bridge. The variations of internal force of concrete self-anchored suspension bridge are analyzed when the camber and the rise-span ratio are changed, and the creep influence on the internal force is also analyzed. The main difference between the earth-anchored suspension bridge and the self-anchored suspension bridge is the axial force of main girder. Otherwise, there is no less than 10% difference in all other internal forces between the two types of bridges. The effect of arch degree, creep and shrink of concrete is very distinct. Ignoring the effect of these factors, the comparison would arrive at a significant deviation of no less than 20%. The elastic theory is applicable to the design and calculation of medium-span self-anchored suspension bridges.
关 键 词:混凝土自锚式悬索桥 内力分析 受力特征 结构分析 桥梁工程 地锚式悬索桥 力学特性
分 类 号:U448.25[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程] U441[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28