检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李瓒[1]
机构地区:[1]国家电力公司西北勘测设计研究院,西安710054
出 处:《大坝与安全》2003年第3期1-5,共5页Dam & Safety
摘 要:本坝坝肩地基中有倾向上游软弱不连续面,通过1号、2号、3号和4号模型试验,分别从正、反两方面说明模型拱坝发生了上滑(抬)破坏现象。从1号到4号模型,由于不断地增加了垂直向的阻控上抬措施,致模型中大坝超载破坏安全度由低于1.5P0~1.7P0,增加到了可以接受的3.5P0~5.4P0或3.5P0~4.5P0。上抬主因是f上盘岩石基础沿该面发生逆向滑移。不同于沿坝基接触面,它是另一种沿地基内软弱不连续面发生的上滑。There are several discontinuous planes dipping upstream in the abutment rock mass of an arch dam.Through the geome-chanics model tests No.1,No.2,No.3and No.4,the upward sliding phenomenon of the abutment of the arch dam in model has been found from both positive and negative aspects.As the structure measures of the resistance and control over the upward raise are tak-en gradually from test No.1to No.4,the degree of overload safety of the dam enhances from less than1.5~1.7P 0 to3.5~5.4P 0 or3.5~4.5P 0 which is acceptable.The main cause is that the inverse sliding of the rock mass of the upper plate occurs.Being different from the upward sliding along the foundation contact surface,it develops along the discontinuous plane dipping upstream in the rock mass.
分 类 号:TV221.2[水利工程—水工结构工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117