检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]美国宾夕法尼亚州立大学教育学院 [2]北京大学教育学院,北京100871
出 处:《北京大学教育评论》2003年第3期21-25,76,共6页Peking University Education Review
摘 要:每个国家都把维护其高等教育的利益视为首要的任务 .在一个正在现代化的经济中 ,“充分教育”就如同充分就业一样已经成为实现社会和个人价值的潜在目标。私立高等教育是实现充分教育的一种理想途径 ,它不但为高等教育增加了资源而且拓宽了招生途径。当然 ,私立高等教育也存在许多不足 ,甚至还存在一些质量问题。公共政策应该保护私立高等教育的利益 ,减少其弊端。对实施“充分教育”的私立大学给予法律的保护 ,为其学生提供资助。The state has always looked first to guarantee its own interests in the system o f higher education. In a modernizing economy, the ideal of “full education,” l ike full employment, has emerged as a goal for realizing the maximum po tential of individuals and of society. Contributions from non-state institution s of higher education may be helpful and desirable for achieving full education. Private sectors can mobilize additional resources for higher education, thus hel ping to expand access. However, private higher education also has widely recogni zed weaknesses, most often questionable quality. Public policies should aim to s ecure the benefits of private higher education and avoid the drawbacks. Such pol icies should be to provide legitimacy to private institutions that make positive contributions to full education and subsidizations to students of private sect or. The goal here should be the upholding of universalistic standards for opport unity and achievement in both sectors of higher education.
关 键 词:私立高等教育 公共政策 经济现代化 招生途径 法律保护 美国 充分教育
分 类 号:G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3