两种腹膜透析的首始透析方案的比较  

Comparison of two kind of the starting methods of peritoneal dialysis

作　　者：吴杏[1] 叶任高[1] 熊飞[1] 邢海燕[1] 李惠群[1] 汪涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山医科大学附属第一医院,广东广州510080

出　　处：《透析与人工器官》2001年第2期1-4,共4页Chinese Journal of Dialysis and Artificial Organs

基　　金：卫生部临床学科重点项目基金(NO.97040228);中山医科大学"211"工程(98151);瑞典Karolinska I

摘　　要：目的：对我院开展腹膜透析以来两种首始透析方法的优劣作比较。方法：分别统计１９９０年以前及１９９０年以后我院行腹膜透析的患者各１６０及２００例，对他们行腹膜透析术后到开始持续性不卧床腹膜透析（ＣＡＰＤ）的时间、并发症、不良反应及住院天数作出比较并进行统计学的分析。结果：旧首始透析方法的住院天数、并发症及不良反应明显多于新的首始透析方法。结论：新的腹膜首始透析方法可以更好更快地缓解患者的尿毒症症状，减少住院天数，患者所需的费用相对更少。Objective:To compare two kind of the starting methods of peritoneal dialysis of our hospital. Methods: 160 and 200 cases of peritoneal dialysis patients were statistical analyzed respectively about their time of CAPD,complications,side-effects and the duration of hospitalization. Results: The time of CAPD,complications, side-effects and the duration of hospitalization of the old method was much more than the new one. Conclusion: The new dialysis method can release the patients' symptoms more quickly significantly and more effectively, and cost more less.

关 键 词：腹膜透析 首始透析方案 比较 并发症 不良反应 尿毒症 

分 类 号：R692.5[医药卫生—泌尿科学] R459.5[医药卫生—外科学]