检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国法学会 [2]烟台大学法学院 [3]华东政法学院
出 处:《中国法学》2003年第3期172-182,共11页China Legal Science
摘 要:GATT WTO争端解决机制中第三方参加诉讼制度 ,尤其是参加专家组诉讼程序 ,其司法实践总是走在法律理论的前面 ;而国际法院争端解决机制中第三方参加诉讼制度 ,其司法实践总是恪守法律对第三方参加诉讼的方式、享有的诉讼权利的明确规定。这两种争端解决机制中的第三方参加诉讼制度 ,前者有逐步向后者靠拢的趋势 ,特别是体现在专家组授予第三方特殊诉讼权利方面。本文认为 ,DSU应该对第三方参加诉讼的方式及其享有的诉讼权利做出明确规定 。As to the system of third party participation in dispute resolution mechanism of GATT/WTO, especially the participation in panel proceedings, compared with its judicial practice,the legal theory always lags behind. However, concerning the system of third party participation in dispute resolution mechanism of International Court of Justice, its judicial practice is always in conformity with the clear legal stipulation of the means of third party participation and procedural rights possessed by third party. As for the systems of third party participation in the two dispute resolution mechanisms, the former is approaching the latter gradually, which especially lies in that the panel grants the third party special procedural rights. The article thinks that DSU should give a clear stipulation of the means of third party participation and procedural rights possessed by third party so as to make the system of third party participation perform its role more effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.141.114