检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘勇[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学国际经济法研究所,福建厦门361005
出 处:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2003年第2期50-57,共8页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
摘 要:美国“1994年主权大辩论”及其后续影响促使我们思考WTO争端解决机制与国家主权的关系。诚然,WTO争端解决机制对国家主权造成了一定的冲击,但是它没有,也不可能从根本上改变国家主权,不可能动摇国家主权原则在国际法中的基础地位。两者关系之争也表明:国家主权在新时期有新的表现形式,但不可能“淡化”或“消亡”;在相当长的时间内,国际组织与民族国家在主权的问题上的“斗争与较量”还将持续下去。1994 great debate on sovereignty in the U. S and its follow-up effect impel us to ponder over the relation between the mechanism of dispute settlement in the WTO and national sovereignty. Truly, the mechanism of dispute settlemant in the WTO will give national sovereignty a certain shock but it will never alter national sovereignty and it is impossible to shake the fundamental status of the principle of national sovereignty in the international law. As also indicated by the debate on their relation, national sovereignty has new form of expression in the new period, but it is impossible to be faded out or extinct; ' struggle and contest of international organization and national states on the issue of sovereignty will last for a period of considerable length.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229