检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]温州市第二人民医院手术室,浙江温州325000
出 处:《南方护理学报》2003年第3期56-57,共2页Nanfang Journal of Nursing
摘 要:目的 彻底清洁手术器械。方法 根据手术病人先后顺序随机分组,单数入传统方法,采用自来水刷洗——煮沸——擦干,高压消毒方法。复数入改进方法组,采用自来水初步冲洗——有效肥皂水刷洗——置于有孔器械篮待续冲洗——浸泡于消毒液5min——滴干,高压消毒方法。两组各200例。同时在每例病员所用的手术器械经清洁处理后随机取样5件有轴节的器械进行隐血试验,比较两种清洁方法的清洁效果。结果 两种清洁方法隐血试验有显著性差异,P<0.001,表明改进方法组清洁效果优于传统方法组。结论 现代医院的手术室必须重视手术器械清洁工作,选用改进方法替代传统方法,确保手术器械生物安全性。Objective To clean thoroughly the operation instruments. Methods The patients were divided into 2 groups at random according to the registered number. 200 patients with cardinal number as controls received conventional cleaning method i.e. brush washing-hoiling-sterilizing at high pressure and another 200 with even number in the experimental group improved method i.e. rinsing-brush washing in soapy water-rinsing in holed basket-soaking in disinfectant for 5 min-drip drying-sterilizing at high pressure. The cleaning effects were compared between the groups by randomly sampling 5 instruments with axes for test of occult blood. Re-Sults We found significant difference in test of occult blood between them (P<0.001). Conclusion In the operation room of a modern hospital, cleaning operation instruments should be paid more attention. Adoption of improved cleaning method can ensure the biological safe of operation instruments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.207