从ISI选刊标准看我国高校学报的差距  

The way to go for Chinese university academic journals comparing to the standards selecting journals of ISI

作　　者：秦社彩[1] 江舟群[2] 张冰[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学学报编辑部,广东广州510275 [2]中国计量学院学报编辑部,浙江杭州310034

出　　处：《中国计量学院学报》2003年第2期150-153,共4页Journal of China Jiliang University

摘　　要：　介绍了美国科学信息研究所(ISI)的SCI确定收录刊源的4个评估标准:基本的出版标准,期刊的内容,SCI的国际代表性,引文分析;分析了SCI收录我国科技期刊中的大学学报的特征。在此基础上,分析总结了我国高校自然科学学报普遍存在的差距,如基本的出版标准不规范,刊物的内容太宽泛,引文情况不理想,论文作者及编委会成员的来源范围太窄等。ISI (Institute of Scientific Information) evaluates and selects jounals based on four aspects : basic journal standards, contents of journals, international diversity, and citation analysis. Only a few of university journals are included in SCI\|E of ISI which have specialized contents and are published in English comparing to most university journals. For most university journals, there is a long way to go because of non\|standardized publishing, nonspecialized contents, poor overall citation rate and impact factor, and authors and editorial board members limited in a small areas.

关 键 词：美国 科学信息研究所 SCI 中国 高等院校 自然科学学报 出版标准 国际代表性 引文 期刊 

分 类 号：G232.1[文化科学]