检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙古自治区医院肾内科,呼和浩特010017
出 处:《中国中西医结合肾病杂志》2003年第7期386-388,共3页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Nephrology
摘 要:目的 :比较霉酚酸酯 (MMF)和环磷酰胺 (CTX)冲击疗法治疗Ⅳ型狼疮性肾炎的疗效及不良反应。方法 :A组 2 0例 ,间断性CTX冲击疗法联合激素 1mg·kg-1·d-1治疗 ;B组 2 0例 ,MMF联合激素治疗。随访 12个月。结果 :CTX组、MMF组治疗LN均能降低蛋白尿、血尿 ,改善肾功能和免疫指标 ,两组无统计学意义 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,但MMF组治疗效果优于CTX组。不良反应 ,MMF组明显低于CTX组 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :CTX、MMF都能有效地控制狼疮性肾炎 。Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect and side-effect between pulse Cyclophosphamide(CTX) therapy and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in lupus nephritis.Methods:A group(CTX group):20 patients were given intravenous CTX pulse plus oral prednisone 12 months.B group(MMF group):20 patients were given MMF and oral prednisone for 12 months. Patients in two groups were compared in age, sex distribution,severity of renal damage.Results:Both CTX and MMF reduced proteinuria and hematuria and improved renal function and immune indexes. CTX and MMF were effective on inhibition of autoantibodies production( P >0.05).Therapeutic effect of MMF group were better than CTX group.Side- effects of MMF group were less than those in CTX group( P < 0.05 ).Conclusion:For the treatment of lupus nephritis, the combination of MMF and prednisone is as effective as the regimen of CTX and prednisone but less toxicity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.185.110