检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王融冰[1] 刘军民[1] 江宇泳[1] 吴云忠[1] 王晓静[1] 池频频[1] 孙风霞[1]
机构地区:[1]北京地坛医院,北京100011
出 处:《中国中西医结合杂志》2003年第7期492-493,共2页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
基 金:科技部"863"中西医结合治疗SARS临床研究;国家和市中医药管理局中西医结合治疗SARS临床研究(No.2003A 208101)课题
摘 要:目的:为提高严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)临床治疗水平,探索中西医结合治疗方法。方法:采用随机对照,对我院2003年4月10日—5月20日住院的SARS患者在实施SARS协作组推荐西医治疗方案基础上,治疗组(35例)加用清热化湿类为主中药水煎剂,并与单用西医治疗的30例作对照,分析两组临床疗效。结果:中西医结合方法治疗SARS在促进肺部炎症吸收、减轻淋巴细胞的抑制状态等方面优于单纯西药治疗组。结论:中西医结合治疗本病的疗效优于单用西药治疗。Objective: To explore the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) by integrative Chinese and western medicine (ICWM), for elevating the clinical therapeutic level of SARS. Methods: By adopting the randomized controlled method, the clinical efficacy of treatment of patients with SARS, hospitalized from April 10,2003 to May 20, 2003 in Ditan Hospital, Beijing weas evaluated. All the patients were treated by western medicine according to the therapeutic program recommended by the SARS Coordinating Group, the Chinese decoction for clearing Heat and removing Dampness was given additionally to the 35 patients in the treated group, but it was not given to the 30 patients in the control group. The therapeutic effect in the two groups was analyzed and compared. Results: The efficacy of treatment in the treated group was superior to that in the control group, in apects of promoting the absorption of pulmonary inflammation and alleviating the inhibitory state of lymphocyte. Conclusion: Efficacy of SARS treatment with ICWM is better than that with western medicine alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175