检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094 [2]中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京100094
出 处:《土壤通报》2003年第4期259-261,共3页Chinese Journal of Soil Science
基 金:中国科学院禹城试验站开放课题(禹开96006)
摘 要:本文以翻耕、铁茬等常规耕作为对照,采用Micro-1ysimeter对覆盖免耕夏玉米田的土壤棵间蒸发进行了较为系统地研究。同翻耕、铁茬等相比,免耕有效地减少土壤棵间蒸发,免耕土壤日蒸发量最低,铁茬其次,翻耕最高;从阶段土壤棵间蒸发量变化看,翻耕的蒸发量较高,前期与免耕和铁茬差异较大,后期差异减小,免耕最低;从蒸发占蒸散的比例看,翻耕蒸发比例高,免耕比例最低。免耕可以有效地减少土壤蒸发量,增加作物蒸腾耗水。We analyzed soil evaporation of different tillage treatments. Although water consumption difference was not significant among the tillage treatments, soil evaporation changed significantly. Compared with conventional tillage and direct drilling, no tillage could reduce soil evaporation effectively. The lowest daily soil evaporation was in no tillage while conventional tillage was the highest. The proportion of evaporation to evaportransportation for conventional tillage was the highest and no tillage the lowest. No tillage with mulch could reduce soil evaporation and increase crop transportation, which was important for water saving agriculture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222