检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱江[1]
出 处:《财经研究》2003年第9期56-61,共6页Journal of Finance and Economics
摘 要:现代产业组织理论的核心问题是"马歇尔冲突",即规模与竞争之间的矛盾。然而近年来各国的电信政策时常相互背离,无法用传统理论来解释。本文提出马歇尔缓冲区理论,试图说明电信市场的有效竞争均衡点并不惟一,而且规模与竞争的兼容是动态的,因此不必过分关注有效竞争的衡量标准具体化,而应把注意力集中到如何确保有效竞争收敛于一个动态均衡区———马歇尔缓冲区。文章最后在实证分析基础上,为中国电信市场深化改革提出建议。One core issue in modern industry organization theory is 'Marshall Conflict'which deals with the dilemma between scale and competition. But in recent years, the telecom policies in different countries are often contradictory with each other, which cannot be explained with existing theories. Offering the Marshall Buffer Area Theory, the paper attempts to explain that the equilibrium point of efficient competition in the telecom market is not the only one. Since the compatibility of scale and competition is dynamic, it is unnecessary to place excessive emphasis on establishing a series of standards for efficient competition, but on how to ensure that the efficient competition converges on a dynamic equilibrium area-Marshall Buffer Area. At the end of this paper, based on an empirical analysis, it offers some suggestions on how to intensify reform in the telecom market in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104