检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北大学人文学院哲学研究所,湖北武汉430062
出 处:《沙洋师范高等专科学校学报》2003年第4期10-12,共3页Journal of Shayang Teachers College
摘 要:价值相对主义和价值绝对主义的关系在某种程度上说就是价值多元性和一元性的关系。一般认为 ,价值冲突常常界于价值的相对性之间。本文认为 ,价值的绝对主义冲突往往导致比价值相对主义更加严重的后果 .它的绝对性、极端一元性对世界的和谐和发展是一个巨大的挑战 ,同时 ,冲突双方一方的消解更能膨胀另一方的绝对性的侵略和扩张 ,使价值绝对性冲突陷入更加灾难性的恶性循环之中。针对这一现状 ,本文提出一些理想性的对治策略 。At some extent, the relationship of value-relativism and value-absolutism is that of the multiplicity and simplicity of value. Generally speaking, the conflict of value is always limited in its relativity, but this paper considers that, compared with value-relativism, the conflict of value-absolutism more easily leads to terrible consequence. The absoluteness and extreme simplicity of value-absolutism is a big challenge to the reconciliation and development of the world. At the same time, the obliteration of the one side of value conflict will more possibly result in the aggressive expansion of absolutism of the other side, which makes the conflict of value-absolutism be deep in more disastrously pernicious circulation. To this situation, this paper suggests some ideal solutions that may lead us in finding a possible way for the conflict of value-absolutism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3