检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐松青[1]
机构地区:[1]福建省南平市水土保持办公室,福建南平353000
出 处:《中国水土保持科学》2003年第2期61-65,共5页Science of Soil and Water Conservation
摘 要:从林冠层、林下植被层、枯枝落叶层和土壤层研究木荷和杉木人工林涵蓄水分以及土壤入渗能力的差异。结果表明,木荷人工林地上部分(含林冠层、林下植被层和枯枝落叶层)的持水能力低于杉木人工林,仅为杉木人工林的76.36%,但1m深表土层的饱和贮水量为5039.5t/hm^2,比杉木人工林高323.3t/hm^2,同时木荷人工林土壤渗透性能也好于针叶林。Water conservation and infiltration between evergreen broad-leave tree Schima superba and needle-leaved tree Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation were studied in the area located in upper reaches of the Minjiang river, Jian'ou city through plot sample data. The results showed that the ground water-holding capacities of Schima superba and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation was 16.3 t/hm2 and 21.4 t/hm respectively. But the water-holding capacity in 1 rn deep soil layer of Schima superba plantation was much higher than that of the Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation (the former was 5 039.5 t/hm2 and the latter was 4716.2 t/hm2 respectively) . And the forest soil infiltration characters in Schima superba plantation is better than that of the Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation.
关 键 词:闽江地区 上游 木荷 杉木 人工林 持水能力 入渗特征
分 类 号:S791.27[农业科学—林木遗传育种] S715[农业科学—林学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117