检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨敏[1] 陈铁锋[1] 余细勇[1] 钱忆之[1] 江桂芬[1] 林曙光[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省心血管病研究所临床药理室,广东广州510080
出 处:《中国现代应用药学》2003年第4期283-286,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
摘 要:目的 了解不同厂家生产的阿替洛尔片的药动学特性和相对生物利用度的差异。方法 用高效液相色谱法测定血中阿替洛尔浓度 ;2 0名健康志愿者采用自身对照、随机交叉方法 ,分别单次口服两个厂家的阿替洛尔片 5 0mg ,测定不同时间的血药浓度 ,用 3P97程序计算药动学参数 ,并对Cmax,Tmax和AUC0~T进行生物等效性分析。结果 两种制剂的阿替洛尔Tmax为 (2 .5± 0 .8)h (受试药 )和 (2 .8± 0 .9)h(对照药 )P >0 .0 5 ;Cmax为 (32 6 .1± 10 1.4 ) μg/L(受试药 )和 (30 1.1± 73.3) μg/L(对照药 ) ,(P >0 .0 5 ) ;AUC0~T为 (2 5 73.2± 737.6 ) μg·h/L(受试药 )和 (2 4 85 .4± 6 0 6 .9) μg·h/L(对照药 ) ,P >0 .0 5。受试药阿替洛尔片相对生物利用度为 (10 5 .5± 2 7.4 ) %。结论 两制剂的体内吸收、消除过程基本一致 ,经统计学分析 。OBJECTIVE To study the difference in pharmacokinetices and relative bioavailability of atenolol produced by different factories. METHOD A single oral dose of 50 mg atenolol tablet was given respectively to 20 healthy volunteers in an open randomized crossover test. Atenolol concentration was determined by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by 3P97 program. Bioequivalence analysis was done to C max , T max and AUC 0~T .RESULTS The main pharmacokinetics of the two products (test and reference) were as follow. T max were (2.5 ± 0.8)h and (2.8 ± 0.9)h, P >0.05; C max were (326.1± 101.4)μg/L and (301.1 ± 73.3)μg/L,( P > 0.05 ); AUC 0~T were (2 573.2 ± 737.6)μg·h/L and (2 485.4 ± 606.9)μg·h/L , P >0.05。 The relative bioavailability of tested tablets was (105.5 ± 27.4)%.CONCLUSION The absorption and elimination processes of two products in human body were similar and the two products were bioequivalent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63