检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]铜陵市人民医院,安徽244000
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2003年第4期25-26,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:比较赖诺普利与卡托普利治疗老年高血压病的临床疗效及安全性。方法:31例老年高血压病患者为治疗组(男性27例,女性4例;年龄68±6a),给予赖诺普利10~30mg,po,Qd。另设对照组28例(男性25例,女性3例;年龄67±7a),给予卡托普利12.5~25mg/次,po、bid或tid。四周为一疗程。结果:赖诺普利组降压总有效率93.6%,卡托普利组89.3%,组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。降压幅度组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。两组副作用轻微。结论:赖诺普利治疗老年高血压病安全有效,副作用小。Objective To compare the clinical efficacies and safety of lisinopril and captopril. Methods Lisinopril group of 31 patients (M 27, F 4; age 68±6a) received lisinopril 10-30mg, po, qd for 4wk. The controll group of 28 patients (M 25, F 3; age 67±7a ) received captopril 12.5-25mg, po, bid or tid for 4 wk. Results The total response rates of lisinopril group and captopril group were 93.6%and 89.3%(P>0.05). There were no significant differences(P>0.05) between 2 groups in the hypotensive effect. The side effects of 2 groups were mild. Conclusion Lisinopril is effective and safe in treating primary hypertension in aged patients. The side effect of lisinopril is mild.
分 类 号:R544.105[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30