《史记·吴王濞列传》和《汉书·荆燕吴传》异同之比较  

A Comparison of Similarities and Differences on the Biography of the King Wu of Bilie in the Historian Records with the Biography of Jing Yan Wu in the Han Shu

作　　者：贾俊敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《三江高教》2015年第3期38-41,共4页Higher Education of Sanjiang University

摘　　要：《史记》《汉书》同为研究秦汉史不可或缺的典籍,在中国的史学史上有非常重要的地位,因为司马迁和班固两人生活的社会背景和所处的政治环境不尽相同,也就造成了两人在写作风格和治史考量上的差异。笔者就《史记·吴王濞列传》和《汉书·荆燕吴传》中有关吴王刘濞个别段落节选出来作一对比,为学界研究司马迁、班固二人治史方法的异同作参考。The Historian Records and The Han Shu are the ancient codes and records indispensable to studying the history of the Qin and Han Dynasties and have a very important position in the Chinese history studies. The different social background and political environment between Sima Qian and Ban Gu resulted in their differences in writing style and methodological treatment of histories. The author chose the individual paragraphs about the king Wu of Liubi in the Biography of the King Wu of Bilie in the Historian Records and the Biography of Jing Yan Wu in the Han Shu and made a comparison in-between, and provided a reference for the academic circles to further study the similarities and differences in methodological treatment of histories between Sima Qian and Ban Gu.

关 键 词：《史记》 《汉书》 治史异同 

分 类 号：K204.2[历史地理—历史学]